Mark 1:21-28
Epiphany 4 – 2021
Marian Free
May I speak in the name of God Earth-Maker, Pain- Bearer, Life-Giver. Amen.
During the week a candidate for the Liberal Party in Western Australia was asked to resign. Andrea Tokaji had written an article on a website suggesting that there might be a correlation between the roll out of 5G Towers and COVID -19. Ms Tojaki also claimed radiation destroys human immunity to airborne viruses, a theory that is not accepted by doctors and which has not been supported by credible scientific studies. Over the past four to six years truth has become a causality of ego and conspiracy. Phrases like ‘fake truth’ and ‘alternative truth’ have been uttered by world leaders and their spokespersons who present their own view of the world, current events and scientific research as ‘truth’ even in the face of evidence that clearly points in another direction.
The internet has given us access to a vast amount of information. With a few strokes of a keypad we can settle arguments about the capital of Uzbekistan, the life span of bilbies or the composition of the sun. Within seconds we can find references to topics that forty years ago would have taken hours of research to uncover. At the same time, the internet has also provided a platform for misinformation and conspiracy theories. It is easy, as we have seen, to promulgate wild fantasies such as that promoted by QAnon (a secret group of Satan-worshipping, cannabalistic, pedophiles is running a sex trafficking ring and that high ranking Democratic Party officials are among its members). Or, less wild, that there is a link between 5G and COVID.
That said, truth has always been something of a slippery animal. Scientific research has not always been objective – tobacco companies have funded research into the positive effects of smoking. Before the internet, charismatic leaders could convince their followers to believe their reality – even if it led to the deaths of millions of people. When there are no objective measures (like tickets) event organizers or protesters have always been able to exaggerate the number of attendees in order to inflate the success of their event.
Religions, even our own, are not immune from the tendency to find evidence to support a particular viewpoint; from the emergence of charismatic leaders who convince their followers to behave in ways they otherwise would not; or to present themselves as more successful than they are.
So where does that leave us? What is truth and how do we recognise it? More particularly, how in the context of something as ephemeral as faith, can we properly discern what is real, what is true?
There is not enough time, nor am I fully qualified to answer those questions but I believe that the gospel and the reading from Deuteronomy today challenge us to consider how we discern what is of God and what is not. In Deuteronomy God promises to raise up a prophet who will speak everything that God commands. God says: ‘Anyone who does not heed the words that the prophet shall speak in my name, I myself will hold accountable. But any prophet who speaks in the name of other gods, or who presumes to speak in my name a word that I have not commanded the prophet to speak—that prophet shall die.’ It is a serious threat – one that does not seem to have been heeded by Jesus’ contemporaries. Today’s gospel is about the recognition of one who speaks as God.
So how do we know who is speaking for God, who is speaking God’s truth?
As I said, I am no expert, but I suggest that in order to answer the question we have, at the very least, to rid ourselves of our egos, our self-interest and of everything that ties us to the minutiae of our earthly existence. In other words, to truly hear and to truly recognize God, we have to silence all the competing voices that struggle to be heard. As Jesus himself suggests, we should not even worry about ‘what to wear and what to eat’. Like Jesus, we should not be overly concerned with our personal comfort and security. We should try not to worry about what other people think about us. For only if we let go of our own desires and fears will we learn to hear the distinction between authenticity and inauthenticity, will we be able to understand whether a speaker (or the internet) is feeding our own fears or offering practical information and we will be ready to listen critically to those who are making promises and to decide whether they are feeding their egos (or ours), and to question whether their ‘facts’ are supporting one, or another, agenda.
Doing all those things might help us to discern fact from fiction, but how do we know that someone is speaking on behalf of God – is God? Here, we are more fortunate than the scribes because generations before us have affirmed that Jesus is God. If we didn’t know that, where would we begin. Again, I can only make suggestions, but it seems to me that some clues are in today’s gospel. Even though Jesus apparently introduces new teaching, his listeners recognize that he speaks with ‘authority’. This is a phrase that is repeated at the beginning and the end of section making the exorcism secondary to the teaching. Jesus is believable because he is authentic. He is not self-serving. He has nothing to gain and nothing to lose. He speaks the truth from God even when it brings him into conflict with the forces of evil and with the religious and secular powers. Jesus has no thought for his own security, let alone advancement. His ego was ceded to God during his time in the wilderness and now he is truly free of any temptation to seek power, riches or fame. Jesus is God and speaks for God because he has rid himself of anything that might separate himself from God.
Jesus has nothing to gain and nothing to lose. He does not need to persuade or to coerce people to follow him. He can extend an invitation and give people the freedom to accept or reject him. His teaching, healing and compassion are directed outwards. He has no ulterior motive. His desire is not for himself but for others and he refused to do those things that might have saved him from an ugly death. His authority comes from his integrity, his authenticity.
So how can we discern the truth? How can we recognise God in others?
In answer to the first we should seek to liberate ourselves from any self interest that might blind us to the truth. And in response the second we can start by asking ourselves whether the speaker is self serving or selfless, whether they are following their own agenda or whether they have the interest of the whole community[1] (the whole world) at heart.
Discerning the truth, recognizing God in the world is our purpose and goal. It might be harder than we think, but that is no reason not to try.
[1] There is not time to look at the reading from Corinthians, but you will see that putting others before oneself is a value that Paul promotes.
Tags: "fake news", alternative truths, discernment, recognizing God I. the world
Swallowsrest 