Posts Tagged ‘inheritance’

Building barns for the future or living in the now

August 4, 2025

Pentecost 8 – 2025

Luke 12:13-21

Marian Free

In the name of God Creator, Redeemer and Sanctifier. Amen.

In many rural communities today, and certainly in first century Palestine, farming land is/was divided evenly among the sons. The intention being that the land would remain in the family and that each son would be able to raise his own children on the produce of the land. As you can imagine, a major flaw with this system is that as the land is divided into increasingly smaller lots it becomes unviable to farm. 

An alternative practice is that illustrated in the novels of Jane Austen. Families who owned large estates “entailed” the estate on the eldest living male relative – usually a son, but sometimes a nephew or an even more remote family member. This meant two things one was that any other son, despite having been raised in privilege, had to find a way to make a living – in the armed forces, in the law or as a clergy person. Women, as Austen’s novels illustrate, were particularly vulnerable. They had to submit to a planned marriage to someone whose income was in a similar range to their father’s – love rarely came into it or, as a single (or widowed) woman she would be entirely dependent on the good will of relatives for her food and board.

We are no longer governed by such laws, but inheritance can be an ugly business as battles through the courts demonstrate. Rich relatives, even parents, can use wealth as a weapon to manipulate their potential heirs. Children who feel unfairly done by take their stepparents – even their remaining parent – to court. Those whose parent has remarried may have to witness a totally unrelated person (and maybe that person’s family) receiving the entirety of that parent’s estate. So often the division of an estate does not seem fair and more often than not, it leads to a focus on money and possessions to the detriment of relationships.

Inheritance is a messy business, so when Jesus is asked to tell someone’s brother to divide the family inheritance with him, Jesus judiciously refuses to be drawn in. Instead, Jesus chooses to reflect on the dangers of greed – of wanting more than we need, of being jealous of what others have, of always striving for the next thing rather than enjoying what we have in the present, or of focussing so much on our possessions (gaining them or protecting them) that we neglect our families and our friends and fail to enjoy the moment.

To this end, in response to the man’s question, Jesus tells the parable of the man with the unexpectedly large crop.

As is the case with all the parables Jesus doesn’t worry about details – the size of the man’s property, his marital or family status. The man is a generic “rich” man – the implication being that he already has more than enough. He is not, like the majority of his fellow Palestinians eking out a miserable existence on a minute piece of land. The rich man already has barns (plural) in which to store his excess crops, the problem is that now they are not large enough. So, he has a dialogue with himself[1] -the solution he comes up with is to pull down his existing barns and to build bigger ones.  (This, of course, is impractical – what happens to the stored and recently harvested grain in the meantime? Jesus’ parables are not meant to make sense, but to make a point.)

We, who live longer and who are encouraged to plan for our financial future, might see some wisdom in the rich man’s behaviour, but the point of Jesus’ story is that the man is so focussed on his future, so determined to build (not share) his wealth that he fails to enjoy his present. Planning for a future that cannot be manipulated or controlled, the rich man has not noticed the riches he already has.  All his preparation will be for nothing, for in this case he has no future, and he will die not having achieved his goal.

As we will see again next week, Jesus has much to say about being content in the present, enjoying what we do have rather than striving for what we do not have, being content rather than living in a state of discontent. Think of “give us today our daily bread”, “do not worry about your life, what you will eat, what you will drink” (12:22), “can any of you by worrying add a single hour to your span of life?” (12:25).

Our situation and culture is very different from that into which Jesus speaks. There are expectations that those of us who can, will set aside funds so that we don’t become a burden on others and that is good and wise, but if building wealth for the future becomes our sole preoccupation we may miss opportunities (family time, travel, experiences) in the present. 

None of us know how long our futures will be. Like the rich man we may lose our life or our health at any moment and never have the opportunity to enjoy those things that we have put off. 

Interestingly, the evangelist has used this parable as a condemnation of greed, but taken without the commentary, and in conjunction with the sayings that follow, Jesus appears to be urging his listeners to live in the present moment , to take time to smell the roses, to appreciate the blessings and opportunities they have now and to trust God with both the present and the future. 

In a few verses Jesus will say: “For where your treasure, there your heart will be also” (12:34). What do you treasure and how do you make that known?


[1] Luke often provides an inner dialogue so that we know what the person in the parable is thinking.

God gives – we receive. It’s that simple

October 13, 2018

Pentecost 21 – 2018

Mark 10:17-31

Marian Free

In the name of God who gives us everything and demands nothing in return. Amen.

The importance of life-long learning is that not only does it broaden our minds and our understanding, but that it also it assists in putting misconceptions and falsehoods to bed. Many of us will have been brought up with the “fact” that there was a gate in the wall in Jerusalem through which travellers could pass once the gates had been closed for the evening. This gate, we were told, was substantially smaller than the main city gates and, while sufficient for a person, could only be passed through by a camel if its load had been removed and if the camel itself stooped to its knees. When one really thinks about it, the story has to be apocryphal – can anyone really imagine a camel crawling on its knees, or a weary traveller taking the load off his camel only to replace it once the camel is through the gate? A smart trader would have timed the journey to arrive when the gate was opened in the morning and close to the time that the market was scheduled to open.

There never was such a gate in Jerusalem but the mythology has prevailed. At the same time much ink has been spent in trying to explain Jesus’ statement about the “eye of a needle” – for example, is the word translated as “camel” really meant to be translated as “rope”[1]?

The story of the gate (and the apparent need for it to be explained) goes some way to illustrate the difficulties that many have in coming to terms with the story of the encounter between Jesus and the young man. So little information is provided by the text that we find ourselves adding details that are not there. For example, though we are not told as much, we speculate that the young man was unhappy with his life or that his possessions controlled him. To let ourselves off the hook we make out that Jesus’ direction to “sell what you own” applied only to the situation of the young man. When we focus on the aspect of the young man’s possessions, we miss other details that are significant. Why, when only about 3% of the population live above the poverty line, would the disciples be “perplexed” and ask: “Then who can be saved?” It is an odd response. Surely, they do not think that everyonein the first century Mediterranean is too wealthy to be saved[2]? Is it possible that they (the disciples) think that they won’t be saved?

A further point of interest is Jesus’ reaction to the young man. It is the only occasion in Mark’s gospel that we are told that Jesus loved someone (and that the one so loved turns his back on that love).

Our focus on the needle and the gate demonstrates a certain discomfort around the question of riches and possessions – how rich is too rich? How many possessions are too many? From positions of relative comfort in the Western world we seek to work out how Jesus’ conversation with the young man applies to us and this is important. The gospel has some very clear messages about wealth and our use of our resources.

Without wanting to minimise that aspect of the gospel, I believe that it is important to examine the story of the young man (Mark does not call him ‘rich’) in its context.

We not that immediately before the young man approaches Jesus, Jesus blesses the children and claims that; “whoever does not receive the kingdom of God as a little child will never enter it”. As Hamm points out, one does not earn an inheritance, one receivesit. It may be then that the young man’s question is misplaced. He asks: “What must I do?” Unlike the children who simply accept and receive what is offered, the young man believes that he must earneternal life.

Perhaps the problem lies here. The issue at the heart of this encounter is one of trust. The young man does not trust in the promises of God, he believes that though he is doing what is required by the law that there is yet more that he must do. This explains why he fails to see (or accept) that Jesus loves him. He does not accept that he is worthy of God’s love. We assume that he turns away because his possessions have a hold on him but it is possible that he simply has no confidence that Jesus loves him and will continue to love him – no matter what he does or does not do.

Our concern with the wealth of the young man allows us to pass over the disciples’ almost inexplicable confusion and Jesus’ response; “With mortals it is impossible, but not for God, with God all things are possible.” Mortals, mere humans can never do enough, be good enough to earn God’s favour – perfection, godliness is impossible. No matter – God dispenses God’s favour and love lavishly and indiscriminately. Our task is to trust in that love and to see where that trust might lead us. Along the way we just may discover that there are all kinds of things (possessions, resentments, insecurities) that we might just be able to dispense with.

God’s love is a given. Just as Jesus loved the young man – as he was – so God loves us, just as we are.

God gives – we receive. It may just be that simple.

 

 

[1]In this instance, Jesus is not being original. We can find similar sayings in other ancient texts (Jewish and otherwise). It simply means that something is unlikely if not impossible.

[2]They are right to be confused. In their culture wealth was associated with honour and status and, most importantly in relation to their question, with divine favour. Wealth was a blessing, a sign of being in a right relationship with God.